Particles and Waves

What is the difference between a particle and a wave?
Particles have identity. You can name a particle. It is like a person having a cristian name. Say there are identical twins, but each will have a different name, we treat each as a seprate person. You see the difference of a particle and a wave, only when you try to observe it. When you observer a particle you observe it all the way. When it moves you watch it's path continously. The wave you can't do it. In a wave you see the starting point and end point only. You can name a particle, since you observe it all the way in it's movement you know that it is the same thing that moves. What you had in position A is the same when it moves to position B. We watch it all the way. It is causal or localised not logical. But when a photon moves we cannot watch it all the way. We use logic to identify it as the same photon imited. We do it logically. We prevent any other photon to enter in to that space. Then we know what arrived is the one that was emited. It is like sending a ball in a opaque tube. We see the ball entering the tube, then we see the ball coming out of the tube. How do we know it is the same ball? logically. It is not causal. We know no other ball entered, so we know what came out is the same ball that entered the tube.

Understand this and it will solve lot of current problems in physics. The observer effect, "the moon is shining even when we don't look at it" - Einstein. Seeing the moon is logical. Seeing a table in front of me is causal. I touch the table on top of seeing it and get the feeling that it is real and not an illusion.

Identity of a particle in quantum physics

Philosophical Investigations-Wittgenstein, para 215. But isn't the same at least the same?
We seem to have an infallible paradigm of identity in the identity of a thing with itself. I feel like saying" here at any rate there can't be variety  of interpretations. If you are seeing a thing you are seeing identity too."
Then two things on the same when they are what one thing is? And how am I to apply what the one thing shews me the case of two things?

Take the case of single electron going threw two slits, how do we know it is the same electron the emitter emitted that strikes the detector? Our intuition, we emitted a single electron, we design the experiment so that outside electrons can't come in, like when you roll a marble in a opaque tube, you expect the same to come out. There's another way of doing it like watching the marble move through a transparent tube. Here you watch the marble move. The identity of the marble is fixed and not changing. There is a difference between the two methods.
In the first method identity is fixed, and in the second method the identity is vague, but we use our intuition to get the identity.

A particle behaves like a particle when the identity is fixed and it behaves like a wave when we use intuition to identity the particle.

When identity is fixed we know that the same particle moves. And in the other case, it is the negativity, like "this cannot be any other, therefore it is the same particle", we use logic to make the identification. The other case it is physical, you can touch and see the particle all the way.

In the second case an observer is present, whereas in the first case observer is absent.

Gaping hole in religion

Four any human understanding basic logic should be adopted.
Let alone humans, any life forms are located only on Earth.
Human beings are intelligent beings, who adopt Logic for their basic understanding.
There are various groups living on Earth, who believe different religions or variants of religions, there are finer and variations among each individual of a group, who practice a popular religion. There belief very in small amounts.
Take the case of afterlife, what will happen after we are dead. Different religions have different interpretations. Each are different from one another.
But logically only one interpretation has to be to true. Christians go to heaven, or god. Buddhist are reborn. Muslims go to Allah. Here again there are small variations along the same group. For example, adult senior males believe less than females of the same group, their religion. Some doubt whether there is after life.
So my argument is: logically only one action it's possible. So whatever the correct result is, after life, most of the believers(or may be all) on earth are wrong.
So, why should we believe a religion
?

Naming particles

Let's assume two electrons are moving in a certain direction. They have the same velocity. And they travel in the same detection(velocity have direction). Then they travel together.Say one is in left and the other in right. So how do you know that, one is in left and other in right. Well it is because of existent of an observer. Observer first identify electron A and B, and continually track the path of each electron. If there is no observer you will not be able to identify which is A and which is B. How died the observer track the electrons. He will compare the change of the electron comparing to it's surroundings, the environment. Since both electron is identical to the other, it is not possible to identify it like you identify John, the person.

A new theory: an unnamed object is a wave. When it is possible to name an object it becomes a particle. Naming is possible only when observer is present. Observer is not a live individual or a machine like a computer, it is the environment. Position of a particle depends on its environment.

Future of Sri Lanka

Sri Lankan should understand this: We went to war we couldn't afford. The results: corruption follows war, economic hardships follows war, it happen in every country, how can we escape it. We are one of the poorest countries. We thrive on agriculture. Whether is getting more and more unfriendly to agriculture.next drought with heightened global warming will kill because of high temperature. These facts should be understood by trade unions and General educated public. But everyone so far ignores it.

Delima of Sri Lanka

China, America, India like super powers don't want Sri Lanka to prosper, this should be understood by all Sri Lankana. The reason, Sri Lanka is such a tiny country, land mass population is merger. One of the poorest countries. So much internal conflict, be ethnic, religious, language, party politics, cast and so on. Long ago Sri Lanka should have been annulled. Why not? The strategic situation of Sri Lanka. So super powers want to keep it. Everyone like to own it. But others don't allow. The best they can do is, keep it from disintegrating, but keep it poor, don't let it prosper, ago they can manipulate it. This is engraved in foreign policies of these countries, therefore whoever in power does not change it. So, stop fighting each other and get together. Our we will never change and not allowed to change.

All Sri Lankan should understand this: ethically correct is a myth. It can be twisted by anyone as they wish. There well be arguments to show anyone is correct. BUT what alternately matters is economic might. We are one if the poorest countries. So we don't have a say in anything. We are always wrong. So be wise, DON'T SAY ANYTHING!

Buddhist monks

Doctors are a greedy unsympathetic ungrateful lot, but not all, not most. Monks, most of them, (may be society should be sympathetic to their plight) have become a cancer to the society. Reason: they are ordained at tender age of below 5 sometimes and live a life without mothers love. At least an occasional cuddle. These are very impart to human development. They are practically orphaned children. When they grow the become sex slaves to senior monks. When they are grown up, they are unable to express their sexual needs. Only option for them is to use younger monks for their needs. The bolder ones will have affairs with women. But they can't lead a normal life by disrobeing, because they don't have means to feed them or house them. These needs are usually fulfilled by the temple. These are the guardian's of Buddhism. They are almost equivalent to ISIS without arms.