Is movement continuous? Suppose it is continuous, then movement of an object will need an infinite amount of data to record it. Our brains are finite therefore we will never be able to observe continuous movement. Also, we will never be able to build a machine that can record the continuous movement of an object. Therefore we can safely assume that continuous movement do not exist. Therefore all movement will be discrete and anything that move will move in jerks.
Then comes the subject of space. Is space continuous? It seems to be so. Space cannot be discrete because if so speed of light cannot be same in all reference frames.
Zeno's paradox of motion solved. space is continuous but time is discrete. Therefore continuous motion does not exist in the continuous space.
Length and time have very different qualities unlike in science fiction.
Three dimensions of length is continuous and time is not continuous but discrete.
No time travel, no wormholes,
Monday, August 29, 2016
Meaning of words, Language
Words represent repetitions of data of the environment. Prepositions that bring together words to form sentences are the higher level of repetitions of repetitions.
Higher ideas are reputations of repetitions of repetitions. This can go on to more higher levels. Certain subjects like physics are related in finding higher levels in certain areas.
The human brain is smart, in fact smartest, it will try to find patterns even when there are no patterns. No patterns in physical data. This is ethics, metaphysics, beliefs, conscience, goodness, honesty, morality. These patterns will definitely have gaps, human brain fill these gaps by correlating to some other patterns. The funny thing is we can never show either there are patterns or not.
Saturday, August 27, 2016
Locomotion
Dictionary meaning of Locomotion is ability to move from one place to another. Parmenides ideas about locomotion and Zeno's paradoxes arise because we assume smooth motion. In reality smooth i.e. continuous motion do not exist.
Quantum Theory is compatible with discrete motion. Take the example of hydrogen atom, the movement of electron and proton, consists of discrete jumps from one energy state to another. In reality free electrons or protons may not exist. Each of these may have an singular opposite. Each electron and proton live in pairs. When they are far apart the jumps are very infinitesimal. But being so is not an argument for continuous motion. Though it may be very difficult to identify at any instance one electron will interact only with one proton. And movement is in jumps.
Curvature of the space by gravitation by General Relativity is an explanation if we accept space time coordinate systems. Special Relativity has lot of problems. These problems will obviously leak into General Relativity.
Motion and space may be concepts created by our own brain. This is not an argument against motion or space, that such things do not exist. There may be some type of activity where our human brain interprets those as motion and space.
Consider the simple case of two objects moving towards each other. If there is no independent observer the movement of one object will not have any bearing with the other - here we disregard gravitation.
In usual practice, we consider that the independent observer have nothing to do with the motion of the two objects. But is it correct? There is no motion without the observer.
Quantum Theory is compatible with discrete motion. Take the example of hydrogen atom, the movement of electron and proton, consists of discrete jumps from one energy state to another. In reality free electrons or protons may not exist. Each of these may have an singular opposite. Each electron and proton live in pairs. When they are far apart the jumps are very infinitesimal. But being so is not an argument for continuous motion. Though it may be very difficult to identify at any instance one electron will interact only with one proton. And movement is in jumps.
Curvature of the space by gravitation by General Relativity is an explanation if we accept space time coordinate systems. Special Relativity has lot of problems. These problems will obviously leak into General Relativity.
Motion and space may be concepts created by our own brain. This is not an argument against motion or space, that such things do not exist. There may be some type of activity where our human brain interprets those as motion and space.
Consider the simple case of two objects moving towards each other. If there is no independent observer the movement of one object will not have any bearing with the other - here we disregard gravitation.
In usual practice, we consider that the independent observer have nothing to do with the motion of the two objects. But is it correct? There is no motion without the observer.
Length contraction
Can length dilation can it happen? Special Relativity do not state length will dilate perpendicular to motion.
However, The alternative theory has length dilation perpendicular to motion.
Consider
a disk and a hole that fits the disc exactly both at rest to each
other. Then these two objects are slowly parted. Then both are given a
velocity and made to move to each other.Then suppose both moves towards
each other at velocity v.
Then with respect of the hole the disc will move with velocity v towards the hole. While, with respect of the disc the hole will move at velocity v towards the disc.
If length dilation is correct both will dilate and further there is noway of knowing there is actually any contraction of space.
However, The alternative theory has length dilation perpendicular to motion.
Then with respect of the hole the disc will move with velocity v towards the hole. While, with respect of the disc the hole will move at velocity v towards the disc.
If length dilation is correct both will dilate and further there is noway of knowing there is actually any contraction of space.
Mathamatics in Science
Mathematics do not explain anything. Used singularly it gives only tautologies. But it can combine empirical evidence and show us hitherto unseen facts.
New Relativity
In Special and General Relativity an moving object will appear the same irrespective to observing angle to the movement. But observers can be placed in four points that will have different visions of the moving object.
If this situation is applied to an electron orbiting a proton in a hydrogen atom. The effects decided by A and B will be related to quantum mechanics. But observers C and D will observe space dilation. Stationary electron will be swelled, but when moving at high speeds around proton it will shrink.
Lorentz Transformation goes as:
Lorentz Transformation goes as:
- It is very evident in special relativity there is no effect for y and z axis.
- What I propose is a dilation in y and z axis. x axis should be available for quantum theory.
Time Dilation Proof
Several experimental results are being offered as proof of Time Dilation are they correct?
Moving muons should have a longer lifetime than resting ones. Relativity means relativity, i.e. actions are relative. Therefore something is at rest is also a relative concept.
A muon moving towards earth is moving relative to earth. But it is not moving from itself. A muon should have a surrounding environment. At least, this environment should be the space occupied by the muon. And a moving muon is not moving out of it's own environment. Therefore though a muon moving relative to earth increases decay time, it cannot increase decay time relative to its own environment. Therefore reduction of decay time due to time dilation leads to a contradiction.
There can be other reasons for the increase of decay time.
Particle decay is governed by the exponential decay — Pioson Distribution — where N is the quantity and λ is a positive rate called the exponential decay constant
Here N(t) is the quantity at time t, and N0 = N(0) is the initial quantity, i.e. the quantity at time t = 0.
Therefore decay probability or half life will depend on two things λ and t. Therefore either time dilation proposed by Special Relativity or changes in decay constant λ may be the reason for changes in decay time.
We assume λ is a constant but for some unknown reason it may depend on velocity relative to earth. Therefore there exists an alternative explanation other than Special Relativity for changes in muon decay time.
The same can be said about atomic clocks that show moving clocks runs slower. Atomic clocks are also related to atomic decay?????.
Also in particle accelerators if decay time reduction is observed it may be due to the same reason?????
t - time λ - τ γ N- P- Nₒ -
the
Moving muons should have a longer lifetime than resting ones. Relativity means relativity, i.e. actions are relative. Therefore something is at rest is also a relative concept.
A muon moving towards earth is moving relative to earth. But it is not moving from itself. A muon should have a surrounding environment. At least, this environment should be the space occupied by the muon. And a moving muon is not moving out of it's own environment. Therefore though a muon moving relative to earth increases decay time, it cannot increase decay time relative to its own environment. Therefore reduction of decay time due to time dilation leads to a contradiction.
There can be other reasons for the increase of decay time.
Particle decay is governed by the exponential decay — Pioson Distribution — where N is the quantity and λ is a positive rate called the exponential decay constant
Here N(t) is the quantity at time t, and N0 = N(0) is the initial quantity, i.e. the quantity at time t = 0.
Therefore decay probability or half life will depend on two things λ and t. Therefore either time dilation proposed by Special Relativity or changes in decay constant λ may be the reason for changes in decay time.
We assume λ is a constant but for some unknown reason it may depend on velocity relative to earth. Therefore there exists an alternative explanation other than Special Relativity for changes in muon decay time.
The same can be said about atomic clocks that show moving clocks runs slower. Atomic clocks are also related to atomic decay?????.
Also in particle accelerators if decay time reduction is observed it may be due to the same reason?????
t - time λ - τ γ N- P- Nₒ -
the
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)