Heisenberg Path Theory

Heisenberg proposed the Principle of Uncertainty. According to it there is an inherent accuracy in measuring two related parameters in connection of a particle. One of these two parameters are position and velocity. Therefore each particle with a velocity will come under this principle.

Heisenberg path is the volume that principle applies.

A volume can be created by combining all these planes

This is just a path with no mass or energy. This path, though it lacks mass and energy it has characteristics. The traveling particle associated with this path can appear in any location of the volume probabilistically. It also does have characteristics of a wave.

These characteristics change whenever an actual physical barrier is inserted to this path.

These are very similar to the action of waves. Therefore mathematically these paths can be derived by applying the characteristics of waves.

But it should be cautioned that this is not a wave. It is wrong to interpret it as have dual characteristics particles and waves - wave particle duality. Danger of doing this we tend to think that the particle is broken to parts and these parts are represented as a wave. If this wave consists with parts of the particle then it will have energy. When we think this is only a path it do not need to have energy. By thinking this way we can avoid all problems associated with this pronominal like quantum weirdness, wave  particle duality, superposition, entanglement, time traveling backwards, many worlds theory, wave function collapses when measured, observer collapses wave function, quantum eraser etc.

Quantum Theory Explained - Advice for Mathamaticians and Theoritical Physicists

1. Quantum Particle can be divided at will. For example you can use any number of beam splutters to produce parts of the particle. Each will be polarized. A single photon can be divided by a beam splitter to two polarized particles and each of these polarized particles can go through a EOM(Electro Optical Modulator) and change the angle of the polarization. Then it can be splitted again by another beam splitter to produce a new set of particles endlessly.
2. The particle being a particle is naturally   travels together as a particle.
3. By performing certain effects on the particle either naturally of artificially. Naturally when it travels near an edge of a barrier, artificially by experimenters in various methods.
4. These different parts of the particle are entangled and communicates instantly when it is realized. The realization is only one particle and which one of the parts that could be realized is decided randomly. 
5. When realized all parts of the particle are informed instantly about realization.

Only little thought is expressed about the source in the double slit experiments. I find a lot of differences that was not properly addressed in different kinds of experiments:

1. At least there are three kinds of experiments. One is of polarized light, second is of normal light and third is other particles like electrons to buckyballs-small matter.
2. These might need different kinds of explanations, because they are fundamentally different.
3. Also they have similarities, so far, only the similarities were taken into account.
4. For instance polarized light quanta is entangles before being splitted by a polariser. Then in a usual double slit light experiment it is said the fist slit will produce synchronized or inphase light. But for the electrons, no such thing at all for the electron gun that produce electrons.
5. These differences should be looked at carefully before divulging to exotic explanations like many worlds.
6. If we need to dish Theory of Special Relativity on the face of the fact certain type of messaging is possible at infinite velocities we should do it.
7. When a particle is fired at two slits, under Heisenberg principal there is an uncertainty which slit one of this particles will go through. Most of the particles will be stopped by the barrier and some will get through. Ones that go through, we cannot say which slit it went through because of the uncertainty principal. These particles can ultimately be realized as a fringe pattern. The fringe pattern is made by a single particle interacting with itself. In other words particle is divided into infinite number of parts interacting of these parts cause this fringe pattern. When at one slit a detector is placed the fringe pattern disappears. The reason is in the action of detection all these multiple parts comes together and gives a reading of it's presence. Then it will carry on with an infinitesimal less momentum towards the screan. This particle is capable in breaking to different parts again. but it will need another double slit to go through to make a fringe pattern.
8. A single photon is splitted to two perpendicular polarized beams. Then each beam will carry a part of the photon. These two beams cannot interact because they are two independent streams separated by a barrier. It will act like a physical barrier where photons travels in two channels. In this case no fringe pattern appears. When we allow these two beams to interact a fringe pattern appears. Electro Optical Modulator will shift the polarized angle by 45 degrees. This will create a channel where both polarized beams can go through. Then fringe pattern appears.
9. But the strange thing happens in electrons. When an election gun fires electrons at a double slit, it is observed that electrons are observed in a fringe pattern. When a director is places at one slit the pattern changes to a two peak pattern instead of a fringe pattern. If electron becomes unentangled at the time of direction you cannot get two peaks since there is only one director. you should get one peak e.i. at the slit where the detector is placed.
10. In can be any detection will collapse the superposition. If the following experiment is performed it can prove it.
11. Several new points are noted: I can't find details of an experiment where a director is places just after the double slit in electron gun experiment.
12. It will be interesting to see placement of the director before and after the double slit in electron gun experiment.
13. It is wrong to say electrons will randomly go through one of the slits. The electron goes through both slits. By Heisenberg theory we do not have information of the exact path. This do not mean randomly one path is selected. It goes through both paths but at the time of realization both parts comes together. This is the moment uncertainty ceases. So what will happen after the electron gun fires a photon halfway we reach out and grab an electron. The thing the garbing will be successful only be 50%. But this 50% is not because 50% of electrons travel through one slit and balance 50% through the other slit. We release only one electron it is wrong to say it may go through either slit, it is correct to say it goes through both slits. Then it is correct to say grabbing will be successful 50% of the time and fail 50% of the time, and when it fails electron will appear from the other slit.
14. We physically cannot do anything about this, this is a fundamental attribute of the world. This is the Heisenberg principal. 
15. This explanation do not have the electron going back, of part of it going back, or some sort of a message is sent back in time. 
16. Forget for a moment about waves, forget that when we look for a particle there is a particle, when we look for a wave we see a wave statement. Try to explain everything by particles first.
17. Splitting a laser beam may be fundamentally different from the normal double slit. Even in the case of electrons there is a single slit in the electron gun. Apart from the laser other experiments can said to be depend open Heisenberg principal.
18. Splitting a single photon from a laser light to vertical and horizontal polarized parts is remarkable and stand in it's own right as a very different phenomena. Then again having these two to come together and create a diffraction pattern is more remarkable and will need another explanation. Because it is difficult to imagine Heisenberg Principal at this time. But remember laser light can be used to get diffraction pattern by double slit- this case normal Heisenberg principal applies.
19. This splitting also have characteristics of Heisenberg split. In both in cannot be said that there exists two parts of the single particle. It can only be said that there are two probable paths of travel. After the particle starts traveling if a barrier suddenly comes across particle striking the barrier is a probability distribution. There is also a probability of missing the barrier.
    
    
20. As a general principal it can be said whenever a singe particle is split and if it is allowed for the probability paths to come together, before splitting ceases, the realization will be an diffraction pattern. 
21. Why is it different interpretations given for electron diffraction and photon diffraction. For electrons Heisenberg Principal applies but for photons only electromagnetic theory applies. 
22. By treating both as particles and applying Heisenberg Principal we can get rid of all the controversies - in fact most.
23. I cannot find anywhere why it is said that light emerging from a single slit is coherent light. It may be Heisenberg Principal comes into effect.
24. One principle and one explanation should be given for diffrection of electrons, light from laser beams and light using double slit after a single slit. But I find slightly different explanations given. Light without laser states that incoherent light is given at the single slit but nowhere proper explanation is given for why is it. Light from laser sometimes produce diffraction without a double slit how? There is no single slit in the electron experiment.
25. My explanation is that there are no waves only particles exist. When a particle starts traveling a path is created for it to travel the instant it starts traveling. This path depends on Heisenberg Uncertainty principle. Also this path depends on the barriers in the line of travel. When the barriers change the path instantly modified accordingly. This path do not have any energy. It is not a physical thing. It is only a path that can be calculated. Though the path is there, it is not a grantee that the particle will come to pass it. The particle may be absorbed by a barrier. The particle will travel forward only if it is not absorbed by some barrier. All this depends on probability. The path is destroyed by observing the particle and a new path is created. Therefore interaction patterns caused by barriers - i.e. probability of the particle arriving at a certain place and causing a pattern is ceased. Certain configuration of barriers can cause the path to give out a diffraction pattern. When multiple particles go on the same path a diffraction pattern can be observed. When the particle is observed or measured the path ceases. Therefore no diffraction pattern appears. In the original Young's double slit experiment, the first slit creates the path. The double slit modifies the path. Multiple number of photons goes through the single slit and uses the same path, this creates the diffraction pattern. When lasers are used in the experiment, the aperture at the laser crystal creates the path. The path is not destroyed even when polarized. Polarization creates a different type of deviation than a normal barrier. When polarized photon are caught at a barrier no diffraction pattern because two different polarization cannot interact to create a diffraction pattern. When the plane of polarization is rotated, it will create a path that is possible to interact. This will create the diffraction pattern again. In electrons the aperture at the electron gun creates the path, the double slit will create a diffraction pattern. When measurement is made after the electron passes through the path is destroyed and diffraction ceases to appear.
26. It is important to understand that the path is for one individual particle. Similar paths can be created for other particles with similar velocities and similar barriers. The path can be destroyed by the action of observing or the particle striking a barrier - there will be a probability of such an event happening. Therefore though two particles paths can be geometrically similar they are not the same. With multiple particles going through same geometrically similar path will give a diffraction pattern.
27. The path is like a ghost associated with the particle. It will not have any energy or mass. It may look like an ameba depending on the barriers. It is just a collection of probabilities. When it is separated and amalgamated later it will create a diffraction pattern. But this diffraction pattern is mathematical. It's values can be arrived by using calculations of a probability wave.
28. This is a better explanation than thinking of time traveling backwards or universe consists of many worlds.
29. Another impotent point to remember this path does not travel with the particle like a pilot wave. Path created beforehand before the particle reaches a point, that point was a part of the path.
30. Electromagnetic wave is not a wave but collection of coherent particles.
31. This is the basic method of locomotion. It is the same to particles and waves.
32. This theory is more correct than the pilot wave theory because when consider all the relative movement of all reference frames pilot wave theory will come across difficulties. Since this path are just imaginary like ghosts we will not need millions of millions pilot waves but with paths it is not a problem because these are not physical.
33. Consider Brownian motion of particles in a liquid. How are you going to apply paths to it. In this case we need to depart from paths to other theories. The paths will be changing so quickly there is no practical use in applying them. But the main thing is, there is no contradiction.
34. In an atom when the electron receives a photon it will change it's path. And then go to a higher energy level. There will be little difference from the standard quantum theory of atoms to the paths theory. In fact I feel it is the same.
35. Polariser will be a special kind of a barrier. The path created by it will be very different from that of a normal barrier. Polarized light going through a polariser of the same direction will not disrupt the path. Also it will not wholly disrupt the path when polariser is placed 45 degrees. Part of the path will remain intact and it will also be able to interact with originally uninterruptible polarized photons.
36. One of the parameters of the path is a set of probabilities. 
37. One single photon can be polarized to parts. Actually this interpretation is wrong. Polarize means adding additional dimensions to the 3D path. Because of this 4th dimension vertically and horizontally polarized paths cannot interact. By using a 45 degree polarizer polarized angle can be changed. In doing so parts of the path is converted to 3D, therefore a diffraction pattern created. This 4th dimension have just two values vertical and horizontal. It do not have continuous values of real numbers like 3D XYZ.
38. For a photon, when it is emitted first from an exited electron in an atom, the first path is created. Whenever it is bounced in a barrier without being absorbed, old path is destroyed and new path is created. It will be similar for electrons, when an exited atom emits an electron the first path is created. When it is accelerated and change velocity in jumps new path is created. This acceleration is done by an electromagnetic field. The field will impart photons and electron will absorb photons and will accelerate, therefore when each photon is added a new path is created. In a laser beam it will be the apposite electrons will supply the energy to photons. Photons will get new paths. By placing two mirrors at the end synchronization is achieved.
39.  Laser produces synchronized light. Therefore it creates multiple paths for bunch of photons. This is the reason we see diffraction patterns easily by using a laser. In other cases maybe diffraction patterns are created but we cannot see them.
40. What part in this system the synchronization have?
41. Polarization and spin. Very similar qualities in twisting the polarized angle and spin angle.
42. What is phase in electromagnetic wave.
43. I am surprised about the deepness of mathematics involved in quantum theory but skimming on the surface the logic of basics. For instance diffraction experiment of Young involves a single slit and a double slit. But for electrons and laser beams only the double slit is used, why?
44. My interpretation: Lasers and electrons give a diffraction pattern not because coherence but because the photons in a laser and electrons emitted by the electron gun travels parallely. Therefore multiple diffraction patterns do not overlap without the help of a single slit placed before the double slit. In case of normal light this won't happen. Photons comes from multiple directions and the diffraction patterns overlap. By placing a single slit this is avoided and diffraction patterns are created only by parallely traveling photons. This interpretation the phase of waves do not play a part. We can do away the waves and wave particle duality and stick only to particles. This also explain why lasers travel a long distance without deviating. Here photons are made to travel parallely. With the wave theory lasers cannot be explained.
45. Two entangled electrons act as one quantum entity. Both entangled electrons are engulfed in a single path. This path stretches to opposite directions.

Two types of data in the world probabilistic and measured

Our physical world can be converted to a set of variables. All physical phenomena can be represented by such a set. If we are careless in evaluating variables there will be duplicates, or a single variable can fully represent many other variables.

observing reduces number of free variables
free variables of quantum physics
free variables are quantum variables that is probabilistic but do not have a fixed value
Delayed choice and quantum eraser - before and after is also affected

We need to find a barrier or mark where number of free variables exceeds it, it shows wave qualities, otherwise shows particle qualities, or visa versa. This mark may have links to plank's constant.

World can be represented by data it consists of or all the variables or attributes it is made up of. Some of all this data is repetitions. When we compress this data removing repetitions we get clean data. This data can be considered as baskets of data, each basket is different, and in each basket we can put all the repetitions. There will be a finite number of baskets in the universe. The number of baskets cannot be infinite - This is an assumption, it's validity has to be considered later. Measuring data is a necessary in order to put it in a basket. There is another kind of data where values are not fixed. This data exists as probabilities. Any data measured will cease to be probabilistic data, and will become fixed data that can be put in a basket. Data in a basket can become loose after any change, that is a collision with something else and becomes probabilistic data.

 A free electron is a probabilistic until it is measured. A slow moving or stationary electron displays particle aspect because of ease of measurement. A fast moving electron displays wave aspect because of difficulty of measurement. The measurement involves uncertainty principal.

These baskets of data are quantum in Quantum Theory.

I have come across a new paradox related to delayed choice and quantum eraser. According to experiments performed, when measurements are made after electrons or light passing the double slit, the wave aspect disappear and particle aspect is surfaced. And appropriate patterns appear in the final screen. Further, when the information which slit the particle passed is erased the fringe pattern reappears. Their is a big paradox here, because what happens in the final screan is also a measurement. Therefore a fringe pattern can never appear, and only particle aspect should be available. Therefore it cannot be measuring alone that changes the aspect of the particle measured. It is important to understand that it is not measuring but the knowledge which slit the particle/wave went through that matters and not the action of measuring. This knowledge depends on the variables that we know, or in other words the amount of data that can be captured. When we increases the knowledge of the system it behaves like particles, when we decrease the knowledge it behaves like waves. The main point we need to know the threshold where this shift happens.
It is necessary to understand it is not the measurebility that matters, the act if measuring need to be done, then knowledge need to be gained from the measurement. If it is possible to destroy the knowledge even after measuring wave aspect reappears.

Another explanation is that whether it is a particle or wave it goes through both slits and that information is stored in the particle, and it is used in the final result. This is hidden variables and Bell's inequalities prohibits it.

The important aspect of all this it is not the measurement of the variables that matter but the knowledge of the values of the variables. Even after measuring, if the record of variables are destroyed, the entity can become a wave.
Therefore the entity is a wave if knowledge value of path information is zero until the ultimate destination of the entity. In the ultimate destination i.e. when the fringes were formed the wave aspect ceases to exist and value of particle aspect becomes 100%.

The above shows a wave created at point A travels to B where the double slit is present, at C information about path is made available. From C to D no fringe pattern. Then it travels from D to E, at D, all path information is destroyed and fringe pattern reappear. From C to D if we insert a screan only two fringes appears, but from D to E fringe pattern is shown. Several points need to be emphasize about the fringes from D to E, this fringe pattern is not a new pattern but just a continuation of the effects of B to C. There is no difference in the phase of the wave. D to E part is acting as if there was no C to D part, rather C to D is just continuation of B to C part.

The conclusion that can be derived is that when the entity passes the double slit at B it has a dual quality as a particle and as a wave. Only contradiction here is when considering classical principals how can a particle can go through two slits at the same instant-note that a detector says the particle went through one slit. If we do away with this principal and accept that even a single particle can go through two slits at once - in particle from at one slit and some other form, may be wave form, at the other slit, what happens can be explained. At C when we get more information about the entity, i.e. which slit the entity traveled it becomes a particle, but though it goes through one slit as a particle some part of it goes through the other slit. The information about two slits never gets destroyed. At D, when the action of eraser is performed, all information becomes normal.

I need to check on one other aspect of the double slit experiment. Suppose a glass block is placed in front of one slit, what will happen? The answer is there will be a shift of the fringes due to the velocity of light difference and travel paths of the two slits are different.
This can be contrasted with a electron gun experiment. Electrons shows fringe pattern even when the gun is slowed down to emit one electron at a time.
The main thing here is in electromagnetic waves the phase difference matters and in particle waves or probability waves it does not matter!!
If quntization is a common phenomena to all energy, how is this difference explained.

GTA online Deadshot

Why world is not imaginary

Suppose there is a mountain and then there are people who sees the mountain. Each one who sees the mountain has a mental picture of the mountain in their brain. This can be represented by a set of data. Each one who sees the mountain will have a set of data. Mostly each of these data sets will be different. Further if one observer moves the set of data will change.

Then suppose that there is no mountain but only different data sets in the brains of each observer. When the observer moves the movement data is used in calculating a new data set continuously. All the data in these sets will be enormous.

Then consider the mountain is real and it's location, size and other details are given by a data set. Then also the location and movement of each observer is given by data sets. All this data will be a finite number.

When you consider the two options, imaginary mountain needs a large amount of data compared with the existence of a real mountain.

Therefore on the theory of minimizing data mountain should exist outside the imagination of the observer. Further it can be assumed that the world is real and not imaginary inside the observers brain.

Why Quantum theory instead of Classical Theory?
Using randomness uses less data than the Classical theory?
If so it will be proof why the world is Quantum.
If wave particle duality consumes less data than either waves or particles, that will be a good enough proof why duality exists.
If we can prove that if wave remains after observation need more data than becoming a particle that will be a good enough proof about the wave particle duality.

Limits of Mathamatics

By limits of mathematics I do not mean the limits of achievements to mathematics by indulging on current achievements. This may be limitless. I refer to physical phenomena that is interpreted by mathematics.

Even here there may be limitless achievements based on current achievements. I refer here some new phenomena  independent of all phenomena currently known. Currently known mathematics will never lead you to a new phenomena currently unknown.

Reason for this is maths is a tool and not an end. When basic parameters are given using mathematics we will be able to make more achievements. But there will be a limit. It can't predict other independent phenomena but it will be able to predict phenomena where there is a connection.

Improvement from integers to decimal numbers.
From basic arithmetic to calculus.
World is flat to a globe.
All planets rotate around earth to sun.
Quantum Theory.
Schrödinger Cat
delayed choice quantum eraser

1+1=2 (one plus one equals two)

How do you know that 1+1=2 (one plus one equals two)?

This is a proposition about essence. It is abstract. It exists in thought or as an idea but does not have a physical or concrete existence - meaning or abstract. It is an eternal truth.

Those truths are always called "eternal truths." The gist of the argument is that truths are part of the contents of minds, and that an eternal truth must be part of the content of an eternal mind. There is already an argument not unlike this in Plato where deduces immortality from the eternity of the ideas. But in Leibniz the argument is more developed. He holds that the ultimate reason for contingent truths must be found in necessary truths - The History of Western Philosophy by Bertrand Russell.

When we see two apples we think they have similar qualities, even though each will have a slightly different shape. It cannot be said apple A is exact replica of apple B. In the physical world no two things are the same. Take for instance two hydrogen atoms, they may have different distortions when they strike the container they are in, though these distortions may reduce with time they may not fully disappear for ever. At least at the time the notion 1+1 = 2 appeared in the domains of mathematicians, they were unable to go the the depth of hydrogen atoms but apples are a good example for defining two. Notion of two came about humans seeing similar things. Seeing sheep in a heard, or seeing everyone have two eyes, hands and legs etc build up the concept of two.

Therefore two was not entirely a mental concept. After observing lot of physical things this concept was built in our brains. After the concept was built we do not need the physical things to substantiate it. Like what Wittgenstein said in Tractatus -  My propositions serve as elucidations in the following way: anyone who understands me eventually recognizes them as nonsensical, when he has used them - as steps - to climb up beyond them. (He must, so to speak, throw away the ladder after he has climbed up it.) He must transcend these propositions, and then he will see the world aright. Then the concept becomes purely mental. The propositions are the ones explaining about similar things, existence of it, it's properties, why we treat certain things as similar things etc.  It is an eternal truth.

Construction of the human brain has a special ability to group things. Because of this ability we can separate groups of things which has similar attributes. Here it should be noted that all of the attributes need not match. A percentage is sufficient. This percentage is not a well defined thing. It depends on the brain. Two individuals may differ. Usually, we accept that two things are similar when most of the human brains agree that properties of both are sufficiently same.

Strangely enough 1+1 = 2 concept will not be complete without 3, 4 and 5 so on. This can be explained why an orange and a lemon are not grouped as the same type of fruit. Orange and lemon will have some attributes that are similar, but we won't say they are the same fruit. The reason is when we look at a heap of oranges we know that the attributes shown by the orange is different than a lemon. To make this distinction we will need more than two oranges.

Problems of Quantum theory:

• Two different properties of a particle cannot be measured independently.
• Errors of measuring properties depend on probabilities. Unlike in classical physics where these probabilities only depend on measuring instruments, in Quantum theory they depend on measuring of other properties.
•  Measuring of one particle automatically decide the value of other particle.
• Behaves in different ways depending on ability to observer the particle.
• Local Realism -  having a preexisting value before a measurement is done.
• Realism - the world is independent of mind. 
• Radioactive decay.

No one is worried about 1+1 = 2 not having 100% link to the physical world - people have thrown out the ladder long ago. But worried about quantum theory - people have yet to start throwing out the ladder.

Errors in Physics

Take a postulate in geomatry, say similar trangles postulate. Practically it may be proved that 99.99% acculately tested. The thing is measuring errors will be limited to a value below a certain figure.
In quantum theory there are also errors but then the errors are probabilistic. Errores may go above any predified limit.

Is time continuous

Is movement continuous? Suppose it is continuous, then movement of an object will need an infinite amount of data to record it. Our brains are finite therefore we will never be able to observe continuous movement. Also, we will never be able to build a machine that can record the continuous movement of an object. Therefore we can safely assume that continuous movement do not exist. Therefore all movement will be discrete and anything that move will move in jerks.

Then comes the subject of space. Is space continuous? It seems to be so. Space cannot be discrete because if so speed of light cannot be same in all reference frames.

Zeno's paradox of motion solved. space is continuous but time is discrete. Therefore continuous motion does not exist in the continuous space.


Length and time have very different qualities unlike in science fiction.
Three dimensions of length is continuous and time is not continuous but discrete.

No time travel, no wormholes, 

Meaning of words, Language

Words represent repetitions of data of the environment. Prepositions that bring together words to form sentences are the higher level of repetitions of repetitions.

Higher ideas are reputations of repetitions of repetitions. This can go on to more higher levels. Certain subjects like physics are related in finding higher levels in certain areas.

The human brain is smart, in fact smartest, it will try to find patterns even when there are no patterns. No patterns in physical data. This is ethics, metaphysics, beliefs, conscience, goodness, honesty, morality. These patterns will definitely have gaps, human brain fill these gaps by correlating to some other patterns. The funny thing is we can never show either there are patterns or not.

Locomotion

Dictionary meaning of Locomotion is ability to move from one place to another. Parmenides ideas about locomotion and Zeno's paradoxes arise because we assume smooth motion. In reality smooth i.e. continuous motion do not exist.

Quantum Theory is compatible with discrete motion. Take the example of hydrogen atom, the movement of electron and proton, consists of discrete jumps from one energy state to another. In reality free electrons or protons may not exist. Each of these may have an singular opposite. Each electron and proton live in pairs. When they are far apart the jumps are very infinitesimal. But being so is not an argument for continuous motion. Though it may be very difficult to identify at any instance one electron will interact only with one proton. And movement is in jumps.

Curvature of the space by gravitation by General Relativity is an explanation if we accept space time coordinate systems. Special Relativity has lot of problems. These problems will obviously leak into General Relativity.

Motion and space may be concepts created by our own brain. This is not an argument against motion or space, that such things do not exist. There may be some type of activity where our human brain interprets those as motion and space.

Consider the simple case of two objects moving towards each other. If there is no independent observer the movement of one object will not have any bearing with the other - here we disregard gravitation.

In usual practice, we consider that the independent observer have nothing to do with the motion of the two objects. But is it correct? There is no motion without the observer.

Length contraction

Can length dilation can it happen? Special Relativity do not state length will dilate perpendicular to motion.
However, The alternative theory has length dilation perpendicular to motion.

Consider a disk and a hole that fits the disc exactly both at rest to each other. Then these two objects are slowly parted. Then both are given a velocity and made to move to each other.Then suppose both moves towards each other at velocity v.

Then with respect of the hole the disc will move with velocity v towards the hole. While, with respect of the disc the hole will move at velocity v towards the disc.

If length dilation is correct both will dilate and further there is noway of knowing there is actually any contraction of space.

Mathamatics in Science

Mathematics do not explain anything. Used singularly it gives only tautologies. But it can combine empirical evidence and show us hitherto unseen facts.

New Relativity

In Special and General Relativity an moving object will appear the same irrespective to observing angle to the movement. But observers can be placed in four points that will have different visions of the moving object.

If this situation is applied to an electron orbiting a proton in a hydrogen atom. The effects decided by A and B will be related to quantum mechanics. But observers C and D will observe space dilation. Stationary electron will be swelled, but when moving at high speeds around proton it will shrink.

Lorentz Transformation goes as:
 

It is very evident in special relativity there is no effect for y and z axis.

What I propose is a dilation in y and z axis. x axis should be available for quantum theory.

 

Time Dilation Proof

Several experimental results are being offered as proof of Time Dilation are they correct?

Moving muons should have a longer lifetime than resting ones. Relativity means relativity, i.e. actions are relative. Therefore something is at rest is also a relative concept.

A muon moving towards earth is moving relative to earth. But it is not moving from itself. A muon should have a surrounding environment. At least, this environment should be the space occupied by the muon. And a moving muon is not moving out of it's own environment. Therefore though a muon moving relative to earth increases decay time, it cannot increase decay time relative to its own environment. Therefore reduction of decay time due to time dilation leads to a contradiction.

There can be other reasons for the increase of decay time.
Particle decay is governed by the exponential decay — Pioson Distribution — where N is the quantity and λ  is a positive rate called the exponential decay constant

Here N(t) is the quantity at time t, and N₀ = N(0) is the initial quantity, i.e. the quantity at time t = 0.

Therefore decay probability or half life will depend on two things λ and t. Therefore either time dilation proposed by Special Relativity or changes in decay constant λ may be the reason for changes in decay time.
We assume λ is a constant but for some unknown reason it may depend on velocity relative to earth. Therefore there exists an alternative explanation other than Special Relativity for changes in muon decay time.

The same can be said about atomic clocks that show moving clocks runs slower. Atomic clocks are also related to atomic decay?????.

Also in particle accelerators if decay time reduction is observed it may be due to the same reason?????




 t - time  λ -  τ   γ   N-  P-   Nₒ -
the 

Human Brain and Quantum Theory

Lot of philosophers have said that God is the super mind. Each human being have a mind. All these minds are different. And at the same time all these minds have lot of similarities. If we create the super mind with all the good qualities of all of humans we get a super mind - this is one of the interpretation of God.

This human super mind has to be different that of a lion or any other animal. Lions vision is catered to find a pray. This shows that the makeup of a lions brain is very different of humans. The male lion kills the cubs not sired by him, then the mother of the cubs willingly cohabit with it's cub killer. This behavior is nonexistent in humans. So configuration of brains of lions and humans are very different. God of lions will be different from God of humans.

The world is perceived by our brains. When we define the qualities and attributes of the world around us, we assume that we can do a good job doing it independent of our brains. This is a mistake. It is evident from the discoveries of quantum theory and connected subjects of physics.

For instance 1+1 = 2 or A and B is true if and only if A is true and B is true, these are eternal truths according to our brain. What if we are wrong! What if these are just constructs of our brains. suppose someone has a gut feeling that 1+1 is not 2. Then we say that he is a lunatic. We have a group of people who has a gut feeling that 1+1 = 2. These are the normal people, these are the scientists and so on.

These normal people cannot comprehend how two distant particles can be entangled in such a way when qualities of one is derived the distant other half derives the opposite. When it is observed entities behave like particles and when unobserved behaves like waves.

The classical theories that can be comprehended by our brains cannot explain these pronominal.

If at some stage we can come up with a theory that could explain these effects then we can put in our basket of understanding our environment, what is happening. Sometimes it may not be possible. At the time when people considered the earth is flat not a globe they could not comprehend certain phenomena. They could not in the beginning understand that world is a globe even after someone explained it. In this way gradually people started believing earth is a globe. Now if someone say it is flat he will be considered as a lunatic

Similarly try to explain the properties of a torus to a two dimensional creature. If the torus is vertical and cut by a horizontal plane we get only two circles. Suppose the torus is horizontal the the circles will be one inside the other. If the torus is slanted the circles will not have the same center. This is what a two dimensional creature will see. In no way you will be able to explain to this two dimensional creature, what a torus is. But there is a certain tool where it can be done. It is mathematics! Using a algebraic equation of a torus, a two dimensional creature will be able to know it's properties. In this way using mathematics we have come to know most of the intricate details of our surroundings. But we can never be able to know all the details. When a new theory in physics is formed we come to know certain details. But we miss a lot.

GTA online (funny moments) total mayhem!!!!

Wave Particle Duality, observability and predictability of a particle in contrast to a wave

One major effect I observed in experiments is that, it is not an observer being present or observing an event that matters, but observability of an particle. That is if a moving particle is not observable it will result in a wave.
Therefore the Heisenberg Principal need to be extended, by adding that non-observable character also must be present for a particle in addition to having a velocity for the particle to act as a wave.
The other side of the coin will be, when observabilty is present in a wave, it fails to act as a wave and will be acting like a particle.

Whenever this factor of observability is erased, like in the quantum eraser, it starts to act again like a wave.

A particle is a bundle of matter. It is capable of controlling the distribution of matter within itself. This is the basic factor that differs a particle from a wave. A wave is free, there is no restriction of it's distribution. The only factor that controls a wave is it will move forward at the velocity of the wave. In contrast a particle moves as a compact bundle of energy. The particle has a controlled movement, it is different from a wave which has a more free movement. The path of a particle is more predictable than that of a wave. This predictability gives the quality of the particle in contrast to a wave. However, this predictability can be reduced by a moving particle, Heisenberg Principal, then it starts to show wave like properties.

Another Idea:
It may be the reason for particle wave duality is not because of some real world phenomena but because of our powers of observation. It is because how our brain works. All observation is designed by human brain so observation is dependent on human brain.

This can be thought as how a cat sees the world which is very different of humans. We assume that our observational powers are supreme and we see all that happens. What if not?

Binary theory of space time

Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is a derivation of a larger principal which says when information is available in a certain event the behavior of the participants are modified.

Traveling of a wave or particle can be seen as a transmission of information from one location to another. Even location can be considered as information, then traveling is change of information.

A particle is at a certain location at a certain time is information. This applies even to a wave. The difference is, a wave gives lesser amount of information.

We may be able to visualize the universe not as a system where waves and particles are located at a certain instant, but as a system of information only.

Waves and particles are a convenience given to us by our senses.

All information of the universe can be represented by a binary map meaning that all information of the universe in an instant can be given by a binary number. After any change in the next instant it can be shown by a different binary number.

Another thing change from one instant to another instant only one binary can change, multiple binaries cannot change. This may be treated as a definition at the moment, until it is proved why it has to be so.

Flow of time is a series of changes in the binary number. We do not need a different definition for time, outside this binary number, since we treat change of universe is a basic attribute and change of one binary as the basic change. The larger the binary number the smaller the change becomes. The size of the binary number is limited by the size of the universe. It should be noted that this binary number incorporates all particles of the universe as well as all waves, visible matter, dark matter and even dark energy.

This binary number is finite, at the moment it is accepted that the universe is finite, therefore it is compatible to treat this number as finite.

 Unfortunately this binary number will explain only the classical physics, quantum theory and uncertancy principal need modifications to zeros and ones. It may be necessary to be replaced by a probability function.

Further, to incorporate principal of causality, we need to connect in some way, or link two or more locations of zeros and ones.

Human Brain and Space

Hither to unexplained phenomena, entanglement and wave particle duality, may have roots related not to some aspect of space but some aspect related to human brain.

These are observer related problems. Two far apart electrons having opposite spins but only realized at the time of measurement. When one particle is measured the spin of the entangled particle will be the opposite of the first measured result.

These are related to measurement or observation. measurement and observation is done by human observers. Their brains is the main tool used for these observations.

You can argue that, what if a computer does the observation, but even here the architect of the computer is a human.

Also there is an argument, if there is no human observer does the sun not rise? Therefore happenings of the universe should be independent of human observers. But in wave particle duality experiments when the experiment is designed to observe the photon the fringe pattern disappear and it acts like a particle.

The space exists independent of human observer, but, certain aspects of the space may be related to the observer. After all observation is poking the system. This effect of poking changes the system. Without poking there is no observation.

In classical physics the poking is assumed to be so minimal that the system is assumed to be the same. In reality this is not true. When the observation shifts to smaller and smaller levels, the effect of observer starts to affect the system that is being observed.

 We see space, we touch space, we live in space. So human brain interprets space. That is how we see, touch and live in space.

Current mathematics and physics may not give the whole picture of space. Mathematics and Physics are all human observer related.

Building a Secular world without dishing Religion

What is Religion
Religion is our upbringing. At the time we are born we don't have a religion. Our parents give us our first religion. When a curious baby tries to crush a moving ant mother will caution him not to do it. This type of experiences take root in a child's mind and later on transform to religion. So, secular of not everyone have a religion. Commonly this is termed as morality.

Religion will have added layers to morality. Morality will be almost same to all religions. People will kill each other for these added layers of religion. All the ills of religion is centered in these added layers.

It is unknown whether the morality preceded the added layers of religion, at the inception of all religions.

May be morality was a later development. At first certain rules were followed by animal who live communally. Without these rules everyone will try to kill each other and the species will not survive. These rules were converted to morality in the beginning. Later on rules like do not kill in vain. Was added. These rules are more towards to efficiency than survival. Any way efficiency is related to long term survival.

Religious layers were added by the baffling concept of death. Death is rarely mentioned in definitions of religion but death is the root of religion. There will be no religion without death and suffering. Suffering is deteriorating of the human body that culminates with death.

One strange aspect of religion is no-one can say it is absolutely correct or absolutely wrong. Because, no one is going to rise up from death and give his experience and explain what happened after death. We could only assume certain things.

Another aspect that we trend to forget is, physically what happens after death cannot depend on the religion you believe. Because different people have different beliefs. What happens after death cannot depend on what you believe, though it may depend, like most religions prescribe, on your actions in life. Therefore it is absurd to believe that Buddhist will attain nirvana and Muslims go to Allah. What happens will be same for both.

Therefore there are enough arguments to show the necessity of religion. So dishing religion altogether is not an option.

But there are lot of bad aspects of religion, like war in the name of religion. Through out history there are numerous examples of religious wars. Currently world peace is threatened by such a war.

Why secular

When world population is taken intro account, more and more people are stopping in believing in popular streams of religion. But in death they still resorts to religion. For example Europe that leads in secularism, still have their funerals in churches. Sometimes, this may be the result of children honoring their parents wishes.

The reason Europe leads in secularism is because, more educated are based in Europe compared to the rest of the world.

Theory of Time

For some time I did not contribute to the blog I am having a site lalsilva.com I am trying to add more and more ideas to this site and in the end I may write a book on my ideas.

08.04.2016

Theory of Time - There is only one dimension in the universe, it is time. Time is the only dimension that is independent of an observer. One of the main characteristics of time is that no two event happens at the same instant – simultaneity is nonexistent. This way infinite number of events can happen between any two events. Suppose there exists two supernova explosions happening at the same time. In a supernova explosion extremely large number of events takes place within a very tiny time space. In the time scale one event of first super nova can happen and the next event in the time scale may be an event of the other supernova. These two supernovas may be millions of light years apart.

Another important aspect of this theory is that time is not a continuous flow of events but it is also not a fixed number of events. Infinite number of events can happen between any two events.

Consider a simple experiment where a light photon is emitted from one jump of an electron in one atom and subsequent absorption of this photon by another electron in an other atom. We usually think there need to be space for the two atoms to exist, there is a distance between the two atoms and light needs to travel in a straight line from one atom to the other. When we think more deeply we find all these requirements are requirements of the observer. And nothing to do with one electron of an atom emitting a photon and another electron of another atom absorbing it. In our thinking we have jumbled up both sets of events together. Now we need to separate it to two sets, one for the benefit of the observer and the other basic happenings of the event or events.

The human brain is very closely bound with the observer. It is almost impossible to the two. This is why philosophers ask the question is everything that happens is all inside your brain. But obviously the moon being in the sky cannot be something that is in our brain.

This theory does not even contradict quantum entanglement. The observer measures a certain attribute of a particle at a certain instant, a different observer measuring the opposite attribute will arrive exactly the opposite of the original measurement. It should be noted here that there is no need for the two measurements to happen at the same instant. The second measurement can be any time after the first.

Without rigid bodies Relativity cannot exist

How can special relativity exist if there are no rigid bodies throughout the universe? We need breadth to have the Michelson Morley experiment. We can't do it if there is no breadth and no rigid bodies. The present concept of our Universe is that it consists of only point particles. Though assemblies of point particles make rigid bodies, those are not perfect rigid bodies. Because particles vibrate in rigid bodies depending on the temperature. 

The same can be said about straight lines. For ages, we assumed that light travel in straight lines. Wave theory of light, uncertainty principals and quantum physics has proven it is not so. According to General Relativity, light does not travel in strait lines. Even straight lines do not exist in reality. Nevertheless, Special Relativity is built on straight lines and rigid frames.

Time dilation in Special Relativity

If we can explain effects of consistency of velocity of light with fewer tinkering of parameters we should stick with that theory. Because of Occam's Razor. Tinkering with length or space is bad enough but extending it to time is infraction. Because time we understand a very little of it. Still we make comments like “trillionth of a trillionth of a second after big bang”.