Tuesday, September 1, 2015

Critique of simultaneity and spatiality

Temporality and spatiality
If we can't get at least if we cannot get a foothold we cannot understand anything is not a good argument to assume something. We need to find a foothold, if we can't do not assume slippery arguments

How to solve the riddle of time?
Some suggestions. I will grow old no-one or anything can stop it. Some day I will die no-one or anything can stop it. It seems these are phenomena connected to human brain. Is time inside our brain?

Einstein's special relativity shows that time is not universal and it is relative to the observer. It means that it is a creation of the observer and does not exist outside the observer.

From biology perspective time have a direct link to cell division and cell death.

 Event counter is an absolute necessary attribute to have any kind of knowledge of spaceio-temporal events.

The counter is the link between reality and maths.

What are the attributes of the counter? The counter needs containers. Symmetry may give this. However, symmetry cannot be seen from within it can only be seen from outside.

Each elementary particle will decay after certain number of interactions. This is the only way for a counter to be present inside each particle. This is the only way that is possible to give meaning to the concept of time, before and after, or spatio-temporal universe, etc. But still there is a problem. Electrons protons and neutrons which consists of visible universe do not decay in time scales that are compatible with our perceptual capabilities. Therefore doubt whether it is possible.

Suppose radio active decay explains actual existence of time (i.e. outside human brain). Still there is a problem, because we experience time without radioactivity. Particle decay is actually strong evidence of existence of time. Even if so something is missing. We might not have understood it fully. In particle decay existence of a counter condition is satisfied.The statistical results of radioactive decay shows evidence of some underlying structure we still don't fully understand.

No comments:

Post a Comment